Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 2016-11-16 21:31:14

BuzzerBee
Forum Admin
From: Texas, U.S.A.
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 4,570

More Database Storage

Why is the database so limited? Does it cost more money to get more database storage? If so why not just make it a paid feature to save worlds bigger than 300x300


TdQRyz3.png
https://wiki.everybodyedits.com/images/5/5d/135_bee

Offline

Wooted by: (2)

#2 2016-11-16 21:52:55, last edited by lrussell (2016-11-16 21:55:42)

lrussell
Member
From: Saturn's Titan
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 843
Website

Re: More Database Storage

It's a limitation of Player.IO itself, more specifically BigDB:

BigDB Documentation wrote:

There are two limits associated with database objects that you should be aware of:

Keys of database objects must between one and 50 characters long, and only consist of word characters (no spaces, special characters).
You cannot save more than 500KB of data in a single database object.

A world is stored in a single database object, and any world larger than 300x300 will likely use more than 500 KB. It's a global limitation with no elegant way around it.

Offline

#3 2016-11-16 23:08:22, last edited by Koya (2016-11-16 23:11:36)

Koya
Fabulous Member
From: The island with those Brits
Joined: 2015-02-18
Posts: 6,310

Re: More Database Storage

More database objects for a world or a new database?

Edit: BigDB is heterological.


Po9cnQh.png

PLNQVL8.png
Thank you eleizibeth ^

1SYOldu.png

I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
giphy.gif

WfSi4mm.png

Offline

#4 2016-11-19 02:59:49

John
Member
Joined: 2019-01-11
Posts: 1,973

Re: More Database Storage

This wouldn't be an issue if EE stored geometric shapes instead of block by block.


PW?scale=2

Offline

Wooted by:

#5 2016-11-19 03:02:57

XxAtillaxX
Member
Joined: 2015-11-28
Posts: 4,202

Re: More Database Storage

This is essentially solved by converting the rasterization of blocks to vectors, as Emalton stated.
Although, this could be temporarily solved by applying compression to the existing byte arrays of x/y/x1/y1 co-ordinates.


signature.png
*u stinky*

Offline

Wooted by: (4)

#6 2016-11-20 12:51:24

Gosha
Member
From: Russia
Joined: 2015-03-15
Posts: 6,206

Re: More Database Storage

what about creating 2+ objects for one level and have limit whatever staff say it is?

Offline

#7 2016-11-20 18:17:46

John
Member
Joined: 2019-01-11
Posts: 1,973

Re: More Database Storage

That would take 2+ times as long to load, and 2+ times the amount of storage.


PW?scale=2

Offline

John1479662266635802

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1713463677.1724 - Generated in 0.086 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.43 MiB (Peak: 1.55 MiB) ]